Out of Stock

Read All Reviews for London Times Women's Floral Satin Sheath Dress

5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Stars


All Ratings

Disclosures & Guidelines
Sort By:
Most Recent
  • Rating: High-Low
  • Rating: Low-High
  • Most Helpful
  • Most Recent
  • Ms.
    Verified Purchase

    Love the fit. Love the style. Great price.

    Read More
    Alicia G. January 27, 2016
  • Beautiful dress for a slimmer figure.
    Verified Purchase

    I absolutely loved this dress but will be returning it. As another reviewer stated (I ignored) there is a weird pooch around the stomach area. I am a curvier shaped woman with a flat stomach and the dress made me look as if I had a pooch. I think this would be better suited for someone more petite in height and size. The waist of the dress hit about 3-4 inches above my natural waist (I'm 5'5 ft tall) and made my curves disappear. Great if you have shoulders to show off; I have a larger bust (38D) that was hidden rather well- still flattering to the bust. There is no slit in the back which prevents you from taking longer steps or getting up into a vehicle- you would have to hike the dress up.

    Read More
    melissabsrn April 2, 2013
  • Beautiful dress and fit is amazing!
    Verified Purchase

    What an amazing dress. Fit,color appearance and definitely an eye catcher. I hope they will design same dress in different colors. A must buy!

    Read More
    brizee February 26, 2013
  • Cute cocktail dress
    Verified Purchase

    For the price, it's a cute cocktail dress. The downside is that there is no lining so choose your undergarments wisely. The way the dress pleats in the front kind of creates a weird, small bulge. If you don't have any hang ups and esteem issues with your mid-section, you can walk it off with confidence. Great dress if you have awesome arms and the detail of the rhinestone is nice. I've always been satisfied with London Times dresses. I usually wear a 10 in dresses and the 10 fits great. The lining and "bulge" issue is why I gave the dress 4 stars rather than 5 stars.

    Read More
    socogirl77 December 5, 2012